Nordic Preacher

Northern Reflections on Preaching, Theology and the Christian Life.

Category: Christian Worldview


Body, Soul, and Spirit? Trichotomy or Dichotomy?

Question: Are humans made up of a spirit, soul and body? Do we have three parts as a human being? More? Less?

My answer:

This is something that good and godly Christians can have disagreements about. In fact, there are even specific terms for the two major views regarding this issue.

First, there is the ‘trichotomy’ view, which proposes that humans are indeed made up of three different parts (hence the name, which refers to a three part division). These three parts consist are the body, soul, and spirit.

The second major view is called ‘dichotomy’, which views the nature of humans as consisting of only two parts, the material and immaterial, or what is often referred to as the body and soul.

Before giving my own view on the matter, let me explain both views in more detail. As already mentioned, trichotomy is the view which regards humans as consisting of body, soul, and spirit. The understanding here is that ‘body’ is the physical material aspect of humans, whereas both soul and spirit refer to different parts of the immaterial nature of man. In their understanding of the body, both views agree in understanding this as a simple reference to the material part of humans. The disagreement arises in the understanding of soul and spirit. The Trichotomy view understands ‘soul’ as being a reference to the immaterial psychological aspect of man, that which functions as the basis for reasoning, emotions, and relationships. The soul is therefore understood as that which separates humans and animals from all unconscious aspects of creation, such as plants. The third element ‘spirit’ is then understood to be something more than simply the soul, therefore referring to the distinctly religious element of human nature. It is this ‘spirit’ aspect of humans which allows them to understand and react in response to the spiritual aspects of life. This ‘spirit’ is then the deciding factor that separates humans from animals, who also possess a soul. It is also often understood that the spirit is the residence for all spiritual aspects and qualities, whereas the soul is the source for immaterial personality traits and such. The key Bible passages used to support this view are 1 Thessalonians 5:23, and Hebrews 4:12, which both seem to make a distinction between soul and spirit, suggesting they should be understood as two different aspects, which together with the physical body, make up the human constitution. Based on a straightforward reading of these verses, it is therefore understandable that many godly Christians hold to this view.

Dichotomy then, is the view which does not see there to be any substantial separation between what is referred to as ‘soul’ and that which is described as ‘spirit’. Dichotomism agrees with Trichotomism in understanding the body as a reference to the physical part of a person. But contrary to Trichotomy, it sees both ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’ as referring to the same nonmaterial part of a person.

I believe that the Dichotomy position is more biblically accurate, when understood correctly. You might wonder why, since based on the verses used to support the Trichotomy view, it seems that Dichotomy would not be supported by Scripture. However, before jumping to such a conclusion, we need to take the whole of Scripture into consideration, specifically how humans are described, and how the words ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’ are used in different contexts. Beginning in Genesis 2:7, we learn that man is made of two parts, the physical and immaterial. We also see that ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’ appear to be used interchangeably in passages as Genesis 41:8 and Psalm 42:6, a comparison between Hebrews 12:23 and Revelation 6:9 also shows the interchangeable use of these words. Luke 1:46-47 also seems to use these terms as parallel synonyms referring to essentially the same thing. Also, in relation to the verse which use three terms (body, soul, spirit) as referring to the human nature, it needs to be remembered that there are passages, such as Luke 10:27 where more than three terms (heart, soul, strength, mind), yet this is not taken as a proof text for viewing the human nature as consisting of four different parts, but rather different words emphasizing different aspects of the same immaterial part of humans. Even though I believe Dichotomy to be more accurate, I think it can also be easily misunderstood and lead to an unbiblical and mechanical division between the material immaterial parts that make up humans. Therefore, I think the term coined by theologian Bruce Demarest ‘complex unity’ is more helpful, since it reminds of the unity that exists in humans.

To summarize, I believe the reason why the Bible uses many different terms to describe the human composition (body, soul, spirit, mind, heart, etc.), should make us think about the complexity of human nature. We should not try to compartmentalize the different aspects of man too much, but rather stand in awe of the unity and complexity of man, since God has created man in His image, we should expect there to be a mystery of man’s unity and diversity.


Premillennialism and Kingdom Mandate in Genesis 1

Is premillennialism based only on Revelation 20? Certainly not.

Here’s an excellent overview chart “Foundation and Structure of Premillennialism” by Dr. Michael Vlach.


Watch the lecture here:
Read the whole journal article here:



New podcast: How Should a Man Live?

A few months ago, me and my good friend Reagan Rose started a new podcast project. Reagan has been doing podcasts for a while already (check Redeeming Productivity) but for me this was a completely new venture. The podcast is called ‘How Should a Man Live?’ and the first four episodes are available on iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcast, and our website:

Like/follow our Facebook page: How Should a Man Live?

This podcast is our attempt to biblically assess the nagging dissatisfaction with modern life that we, and other men we have talked to, experience. We go back to Scripture to examine life in the light of creation and the new creation to come. Who were we made to be? What were we made to do? Where is humanity heading in God’s plan? And how should that impact how we choose to live today?




New Creation Model vs. Spiritual Vision Model? A Basic Introduction to New Creation Eschatology

What is New Creation Eschatology, and how is it different from what has been called the Spiritual Vision model? How do these models affect our understanding of the Bible, and God’s purposes for mankind? What relevance does it have for daily living as a Christian?

Let’s begin by some basic definitions for both of these models. The Spiritual Vision Model is a term used to describe the general view that would state that God’s ultimate purposes are only spiritual, therefore disregarding the physical realm as somewhat unnecessary or even inherently evil. Whereas, the New Creation Model places emphasis on both the physical and spiritual aspects of God’s creation, disregarding neither of them as evil or unnecessary.

Read More


The Biblical Significance of the Beard: A God-given Sign of Gender Distinction and Maturity?

PERSONAL NOTE: Every now and then I get comments from fellow Christians suggesting that it might be unsuitable for Christian men to have beards. For the purpose of publicly explaining my views on the matter, below is the contents of a seminary research paper I have written on the subject, for which I got very encouraging feedback from my professor. Just to be clear, these are simply my own personal views (even though I certainly believe them to be biblically based) and do NOT represent any official view of the church where I have the privilege to serve. Neither do I seek to make others agree with me, rather I simply want to clearly express my own views on this minor topic, for the purpose of helping others understand my biblical reasoning on the matter, even if they end up disagreeing with my conclusions. Anyway, below is the article, which is obviously a little longer than a normal blog post, due to it being a research paper. I hope it will be helpful for others thinking through the issues involved in this subject.



In the well-known fictional work, The Screwtape Letters by C. S. Lewis, there is a somewhat interesting remark made by the senior Demon ‘screwtape’ as he is instructing the younger demon on how to entice humans to sin,

“Thus we have now for many centuries triumphed over nature to the extent of making certain secondary characteristics of the male (such as the beard) disagreeable to nearly all the females­–and there is more in that than you might suppose.”[1]

Was C. S. Lewis actually on to something with this strange comment by this fictional demon? Is there actually a God given purpose for the ‘secondary characteristics of the male’, the beard in particular? Does the suppression of this natural symbol of manliness actually signify something more than one might first suppose? Even more specifically, is it completely foolish to even suggest that there might be good biblical reasons for men to have beards? In fact, could the beard even be considered a sign of gender distinction and maturity?

Read More

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén